Do You Have Unclaimed Pension Benefits?

Estimated R20bn owed to roughly 3.5m beneficiaries.
JOHANNESBURG – The total value of unclaimed retirement benefits has steadily risen over the last few years and is estimated to have reached around R20 billion owed to roughly 3.5 million beneficiaries by 2014.

This is according to the latest Annual Report of the Registrar of Pension Funds.

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 3.38.57 PM

Source: Financial Services Board (FSB)

The statistics

Rosemary Hunter, deputy registrar of pension funds at the FSB, says a recent survey suggests the average amount of unclaimed benefits held by an unclaimed benefit fund (not the original pension fund) is roughly R5 000.

While R5 000 is not a significant amount of money, for a lot of South Africans it would offer the opportunity to send a child to school or to pay for a taxi ride to apply for a job, she says.

Hunter says there are about 50 “active” registered unclaimed benefit funds. Others have been registered, but are still getting off the ground.

These funds have an estimated R4.6 billion in unclaimed benefits owed to around 792 000 beneficiaries. Most of the unclaimed benefits are parked in the original funds in which these benefits accrued and only about a quarter is held in unclaimed benefit funds.

Reportedly, about 60% of unclaimed benefits in mining industry funds are for foreign workers which include people who had to leave the country when their visas expired. This has made it difficult for them to claim their benefits.

The statistics do not include unclaimed benefits of the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF), which apparently has about R500 million in unclaimed benefits of its own. It also excludes Telkom’s pension fund, the Post Office retirement fund, the three Transnet retirement funds and a few other funds.

Why beneficiaries don’t claim

Hunter says a lot of member data maintained by pension funds and administrators are incomplete and aren’t kept up to date – for example when mobile numbers change.

Some funds also seem to have a lack of expertise or resources to trace beneficiaries and unfortunately one of the consequences of this is that a lot of people have set themselves up to be intermediaries – offering to claim benefits on behalf of beneficiaries in exchange for a portion of the benefits.

Hunter says while pension funds may hire intermediaries, members shouldn’t be signing up to pay people to claim their benefits.

“They are entitled to get their benefits for free. If the funds want to hire people to go out and trace [beneficiaries] they can do that – then the funds must pay [the intermediary]. But unfortunately a lot of people think that they can’t make a claim unless they go through a lawyer or some financial services provider and that means that they lose a lot of value.”

Some people aren’t aware that they are entitled to the benefits. This include instances where members were previously fired for misconduct or may be deceased.

“Our law says that your rights to your pension benefit are completely separate to your rights to remuneration.”

There are also cases where employees have already left the organisation and the employer don’t see the benefit to assist in finding the beneficiary.

“Particularly if they left on bad terms the employers can be very unhelpful.”

There are also instances where members believe the amounts are too small to claim, they may not want to provide personal payment information to the fund or its administrator or are trying to avoid tax-related issues.

What beneficiaries should do

Where members suspect that they have unclaimed benefits, the first port of call should be their former employer, which will most likely be in the best position to identify the fund to which the member belonged.

Hunter says if the employer can’t help or doesn’t exist anymore, beneficiaries should contact the fund or administrator if they know these parties. Payslips or benefit statements may point beneficiaries in the right direction.

If these efforts don’t deliver results, beneficiaries can also contact the FSB by sending an e-mail to pensions.queries@fsb.co.za.

Hunter says the FSB is often approached first, but unfortunately it does not have the capacity to deal with the significant number of queries.

The FSB’s call centre currently deals with more than 1 000 queries related to unclaimed benefits every month.

“We would like to encourage people to go first to their employers and funds and administrators if they can. But we will try and help if that doesn’t yield anything.”

Source: http://www.moneyweb.co.za/news/south-africa/unclaimed-pension-benefits/

JSE ‘recovers’ after aggressive global selloffs

Reserve Bank declares it is ready to intervene to protect the rand.

In a day of near madness which saw the JSE All Share Index (Alsi) plummet by more than 5%, the index managed to recover in late afternoon trade to close only 2.85% down.

The market rout followed severe selloffs after the Shanghai exchange shed 8.5% to augment concerns about the Chinese economy. The blood also flowed in Europe where the FTSE 100 (-4.5%), the DAX (-3.7%) and the CAC40 (-4.6%) saw aggressive selloffs.

The Dow Jones also opened nearly 5% lower, but recovered in mid-morning trade to trade down 2.9%.

The selling seems to be across the board. Basil Read fell by nearly 20%, EOH by 9.9%, Glencore by 8.6%, MTN was down 7.8%, Northam 6.7%, Anglo American by 6.5%, Kumba by 6.4% and BHP Billiton by 5.6%.

On the upside gold counters performed well. AngloGold jumped by 7.6%, Harmony by 6.3% and Goldfields by 4.8%.

The gold price was down 0.34% trading at $1157, while platinum was down 3.1% at $987.

Rand under pressure

This selloff also follows a sharp devaluation of the rand. At 5:40pm the rand was trading at R13.18 to the dollar, after touching R14 briefly over the weekend. The currency was also trading weaker against the euro (R15.29) and pound sterling (R20.79).

The Reserve Bank (Sarb) has announced that it is considering intervening in the market, a step the bank has avoided in recent years as such intervention is usually not very effective. “In the event of developments that threaten the orderly functioning of markets or that may have financial stability implications, the Sarb may consider becoming involved in foreign-exchange markets to ensure orderly market conditions,” the bank said in a statement.

“While we are concerned about excessive volatility, the Sarb is committed to the exchange rate of the rand being set by market forces,” it stated.

Approaching bear market

The JSE is now firmly entrenched in an official correction. The Alsi has shed 4.3% since the beginning of the year, and 18% since April when the index reached an all-time high. If the Alsi would show losses in excess of 20% since April, the index would enter an official bear market.

In a note issued on Monday, Investec Asset Management’s Clyde Rossouw and Sumesh Chetty, say the current market turmoil comes as no surprise. “Over the past few months we have seen markets start to retreat, and the most recent turmoil is a more violent expression of this.”

Rossouw and Chetty also contend that the global picture is not much rosier. “China continues to print real GDP growth figures of 7%, but our analysis shows that the economy is actually contracting.”

The portfolio managers also say the US economy is weaker than reported numbers suggest. “Growth and job creation over the last six years has been supported by the booming shale oil states, with the rest of the country still in decline. With the count of shale oil rigs reducing as a result of lower oil prices, we are concerned that investors will not see the economic recovery that they are anticipating. We believe that this weakness will limit the extent to which the Fed will be able to raise rates, and that a normalisation of interest rates is highly unlikely.”

Rossouw and Chetty also believe that the market slowdown is set to continue as “there is no significant wall of cash waiting to drive them higher. We believe this is a very necessary correction to bring market valuations more in line with muted growth expectations.”

Foreigners are net sellers

Ryan Wibberley, head of trading at Investec Asset Management, says Monday’s selloff, while particularly severe, is not an isolated event and follows similar declines over the past few weeks on several international markets. “If you add them up, there have been major reversals around the world.”

He says there is concern over the slowdown in Chinese economic activity and the impact this will have on the global economy. “If you believe there will be a protracted global economic slowdown then this could be just the beginning of market weakness. But if you feel there are the necessary tools to arrest the situation and stir growth then perhaps the current pullback is an opportunity. A delay in a US rate hike might help markets, as might stimulus activity out of China”

It also seems as if foreigners have been selling local equities in recent weeks. “We have seen net foreign selling in recent weeks, but this has been across several emerging markets,” Wibberley says. “The rand was consequently hard hit as it is such a liquid currency.”

He says the high beta stocks are especially being hit. “The likes of MTN and Naspers are highly liquid and they are bearing the brunt of the selloffs.”

Source: http://www.moneyweb.co.za/investing/equities/panic-selling-on-the-jse/

Code of Good Practice (Code) on Equal Pay/Remuneration for Work of Equal Value – Government Gazette Vol 600 Pretoria 1 June 2015 No 38837

On the 1st of June 2015. in terms of Section 54(1) of the Employment Equity Act (EEA), 1998 (Act No 55 of 1998 as amended) the Minister of Labour issued the Code of Good Practice (Code) on Equal Pay/Remuneration for Work of Equal Value. The Code promotes the elimination of unfair discrimination in respect of pay/remuneration by applying the principle of equal pay/remuneration for work of equal value.

The objectives of the Code are (1) to provide practical guidance to employers and employees on how to apply the principle of equal pay/remuneration for work of equal value in their workplaces, (2) to promote the implementation of pay/remuneration equity in the workplace by employers, including the State, employees and trade unions through human resources policies, practices and job evaluation processes and (3) to seek putting into practice equal pay through human resources and pay/remuneration policies, practices, and proper consultation procedures as well as the management thereof within a sound governance framework that will drive the principle of equal pay in a fair, consistent and “free from unfair discrimination” manner.

The Code aligns its principles with sound remuneration practice through the following focus areas:

Alignment of remuneration policy with the principles of equal pay. (Section 3, Page 9)
Eliminating unfair discrimination by taking steps to eliminate differences in terms and conditions of employment.(Section 4, Page 10)
The 4 criteria that should form part of the Job Evaluation System used in your organisation. (Sub section 5.4, Page 11)
The process that should be followed when evaluating jobs for the purposes of equal pay for work of equal value. (Section 8, Page 14)
Gender discrimination – establishing the value of male- and female -dominated jobs in order to be able to ascertain whether particular jobs have been undervalued in the past. (Section 6, Page 12)
The factors justifying differentiation in pay/remuneration. (Section 7, Page 13)

The Code provides 3 key issues (Sub section 4.4, page 10) which require scrutiny when examining whether the employer is complying with its obligation to apply equal pay in the workplace, as depicted below –

equal-work-equal-pay-1

The schematic below highlights the main areas where the employer will be obligated to ensure compliance by conducting internal reviews, analysis, reporting and corrective action.

equal-work-equal-pay-3

Remuneration Consultants South Africa have extensive experience in reviewing Employment Contracts and Remuneration policies, procedures and practices to assess the level of compliance to the principles of equal pay. Our team of reward specialist professionals, including lawyers, will assist your company with the following:

Design a “Pay Diagnostic and Assessment Tool” to proactively measure and analyse your pay/remuneration internal equity and highlight possible risks of non-compliance.
Job Evaluation – We have extensive experience in Job Evaluation having used numerous Job Evaluation Systems, provided training on conducting Job Evaluation and attended Job Evaluation Committees as external advisors to companies.
Review your Remuneration Policy and Employment Contracts to ensure alignment to the principle of equal pay and ensuring good corporate governance thereon.

Nhlanhla Nene’s 2015 Budget speech

Honourable Speaker

I have the honour to present the first budget of our fifth democratic Parliament.

Members of the House, and fellow South Africans. Over the past twenty years we have built houses, delivered water and electricity, improved access to schools and health care. Yet there are people living in shacks, there are schools without sanitation, there are patients without care.

We have made progress in dismantling apartheid divisions. Yet there are still fault-lines across our social landscape. We have agreed on a National Development Plan. But there is still hard work ahead in its implementation.

Though we continue to register positive growth rates, many businesses have struggled to maintain profitability, unemployment remains high and government has had to adjust to slower revenue growth.

Today’s budget is constrained by the need to consolidate our public finances, in the context of slower growth and rising debt.

And so we must intensify efforts to address economic constraints, improve our growth performance, create work opportunities and broaden economic participation. We need to achieve these goals if our National Development Plan is to be realised.

On the one hand, our development path is limited by the resource constraints of thecurrent economic outlook. On the other hand, it seeks to lift these constraints by strengthening public institutions, investing in infrastructure and our people, supporting innovation and making markets work better. The 2015 budget is aimed at rebalancing fiscal policy to give greater impetus to investment, to support enterprise development, to promote agriculture and industry and to make our cities engines of growth.

Strategic priorities for growth and development

As outlined by President Zuma in the State of the Nation Address on the 12th of February, Cabinet has agreed on nine strategic priorities to be pursued this year, in partnership with the private sector and all stakeholders.

They include:
resolving the energy challenge,
revitalising agriculture,
adding value to our mineral wealth,
enhancement of the Industrial Policy Action Plan,
encouragement of private investment,
Reducing workplace conflict,
unlocking the potential of small enterprises,
infrastructure investment, and
support for implementation of the National Development Plan through indepth, results-driven processes, known as phakisa laboratories.

The first of these laboratories focused on the oceans economy, including off-shore oil and gas exploration and aquaculture opportunities. Already this has led to investment of R9.6 billion in Saldanha Bay.

Strategies for improving primary health clinics have also been developed through a phakisa process. The mining sector will be next. These processes draw widely on the talents and expertise of South Africans, from the public and private sectors, and the scientific and research community.

In each of these areas, there are many programmes and interventions underway, and numerous stakeholders and institutions involved.

Members of the House will appreciate, however, that having a plan and a series of activities is not enough. Intensive effort has to go into the details of implementation, understanding the risks and opportunities of changing market conditions as well as identifying institutional and financial options.

There are many possible plans and priorities: the challenge of governance is to choose wisely between competing alternatives.

The budget plays a role in clarifying these options, probing their costs and assessing implementation modalities. It seeks to allocate resources systematically and fairly.

This year, we received around 400 tips from fellow South Africans on the budget. Quite rightly, there are two main areas of concern.

Many people have concerns about public service delivery. For example, Asif Jhatham advises that municipalities should follow SARS in adopting electronic payments systems. Marc de Chalain appeals for an improved work ethic and pride in a job well done in the public service. Mpumelelo Ncwadi suggests that youth-owned cooperatives should be supported to produce lettuce and herbs for local hospitals and schools.

And then there is much advice to me on tax matters. Christopher Pappas suggests that fast foods should be subject to sin tax. Mandy Morris says it is time VAT was increased to 15 per cent. On the other hand, Thabile Wonci proposes that young professionals should be exempt from tax for at least one year of work.

Honourable Speaker, I will return shortly to these tax questions.

The budget documents I table today are designed to make our budget choices and their implications transparent. The processes which follow in this House, bringing medium term plans and programmes under the scrutiny of portfolio committees and subjecting Ministers and officials to Parliamentary accountability, are essential disciplines in the translation of plans into service delivery programmes.

And so in presenting this Budget to Members of the House, I am obliged to caution that it again comprises a weighty set of documents and explanatory papers.

Members who feel that the burden of after-hours reading is excessive are referred to my predecessors, Minister Gordhan and former Minister Manuel, who oversaw the design of these instruments of accountability.

Thankfully their advice to me is that it does not all have to be incorporated into the budget speech.

Allow me therefore to recommend this year’s Budget Review for the further attention of Members. It is somewhat differently structured from the past. There is a new chapter on the financial position of public sector entities, and an annexure on progress in infrastructure spending.

Economic context

I turn now to the economic context within which the budget has been prepared.

Global economic growth is expected to remain sluggish over the period ahead, rising from 3.3 per cent in 2014 to 3½ per cent this year. There is considerable variation in economic performances between countries and economic trends are likely to be volatile. In the United States, 3.6 per cent growth is expected this year, but in Europe the outlook remains weak, and could still be destabilised by disagreements between debtor and creditor nations.

In emerging markets and developing economies, growth of about 4½ per cent is expected. China’s growth is expected to slow to 6.8 per cent this year. Amongst our neighbours in Africa, the recent shifts in commodity prices will benefit some countries and disadvantage others.

South Africa will benefit from the lower oil price, but our major commodity exports have been negatively affected by the global slowdown. Our deepening trade and investment links with sub-Saharan Africa continue to offer favourable growth prospects. Exports to Africa grew by 19 per cent in 2013 and 11 per cent in 2014.

However, our primary challenge is to deal with the structural and competitiveness challenges that hold back production and investment in our economy.

The most important of these is the security and reliability of energy supply. Electricity constraints hold back growth in manufacturing and mining, and also inhibit investment in housing and raise costs for businesses and households.

Mainly for this reason, our projected economic growth for 2015 is just 2 per cent, down from 2.5 per cent indicated in October last year. We expect growth to rise to 3 per cent by 2017. Consumer price inflation peaked at 6.6 per cent in June last year. It has subsequently declined to just 4.4 per cent last month, and is expected to average 4.3 per cent in 2015, laying a foundation for economic growth.

Higher growth is possible, if we make good progress in responding to the electricity challenge or if export performance is stronger. The best short-term prospects for faster growth lie in less energy-intensive sectors such as tourism, agriculture, light manufacturing and housing construction. These are also sectors that employ more people, and so they contribute to more inclusive growth. Efforts to support these sectors have to be intensified.

Progress in agriculture and manufacturing employment requires a constructive labour relations environment, and well-targeted support for emerging enterprises. While the manufacturing sector has largely underperformed in recent years, there has been an encouraging growth in investment since 2010, particularly in upgrading machinery and equipment. The turnaround in footwear and textiles is also welcome, and should boost job creation over the period ahead. In agriculture we have seen investment and export growth in horticultural products such as grapes, citrus and tree nuts.

Tourism and related services, oil and gas development, communications and information technology also offer many opportunities.

Although our fiscal position is constrained, there are considerable financial strengths on which South Africa’s growth strategy can build.
Interest rates have remained moderate, which reflects the credibility of fiscal and monetary policy and the favourable inflation outlook. The capital
market rates at which government and the corporate sector borrow have declined over the past year, signalling continued investor confidence in the
South African economy.
The exchange rate depreciated by 11 per cent against the US dollar in 2014, after declining by 15 per cent in 2013. This coupled with low inflation
contributes to our trade competitiveness, and partially offsets the deterioration in commodity prices.
Our banks and other financial institutions are well-capitalised. South Africa has a buoyant capital market, is open to foreign investors and is a major
contributor to foreign direct investment elsewhere in Africa. Our company law and tax frameworks are robust, and we have excellent property market institutions.

The first phase of implementation of the National Development Plan is elaborated in Government’s medium term strategic framework. If we remain united and energised around its implementation – government, labour, business and all South Africans – we will continue to make progress towards a just and prosperous future.

Budget framework and fiscal policy

A sound budget framework is one of the enabling conditions for implementation of the National Development Plan.

It has now been eight years since the global financial crisis began. In responding to low economic growth, government allowed for continued expenditure growth and a wider budget deficit to cushion the economy from a potential hard landing, resulting in an increased debt burden on the state. Fiscal room created during the economic boom leading up to the financial crisis cushioned against tax increases as a first response.

Our fiscal rebalancing has included cost containment measures and intensified efforts to improve efficiency in expenditure. These measures are yielding positive results. However, growth performance remains weak and substantial repayments of debt are becoming due. It is now clear that we can no longer postpone consideration of additional revenue measures. In choosing amongst our tax options, the financial health of households and businesses is a primary consideration.

As indicated in the Medium Term Budget Policy Statement, the key features of the budget framework for the period ahead are as follows:
A reduction in the main budget expenditure ceiling of about R25 billion over the next two years, compared with the 2014 Budget baseline,
An increase in taxes amounting to R17 billion in 2015/16,
Revised spending plans across the whole of government, aimed at greater efficiency, reduced waste and an improved composition of spending,
A consolidation of government personnel numbers, and
Financing of state-owned companies, where required, without raising national government’s budget deficit.

In the budget framework tabled today, a consolidated deficit of 3.9 per cent of GDP is projected for 2015/16, falling to 2.5 per cent in 2017/18.

Consolidated non-interest expenditure will rise from R1.123 trillion this year to R1.4 trillion in 2017/18, which is an average real increase of 2.1 per cent a year. The share of personnel compensation is projected to remain about 40 per cent of noninterest spending. Interest on state debt will rise from R115 billion this year to R153 billion in 2017/18.

Reductions in budget allocations have been targeted at non-critical activities. Cost containment and reprioritisation measures will limit growth in allocations for goods and services to 5 per cent a year. Spending on catering, entertainment and venues is budgeted to decline by 8 per cent a year, travel and subsistence will be cut back by 4 per cent a year, in real terms. But allocations for critical items such as school books and medicine, for police vehicles’ fuel and for maintenance of infrastructure, will grow faster than inflation. Compliance will be reported by the Auditor-General.

The budget framework includes an unallocated contingency reserve of R5 billion next year, R15 billion in 2016/17 and R45 billion in 2017/18. This could allow for new spending priorities to be accommodated in future budgets. It takes into account that the economic outlook is uncertain and that both weaker growth and rising interest rates are possible over the period ahead. We are also mindful that public service salary negotiations have still to be concluded. We hope that agreement will be reached in time for salary improvements to be implemented in April.

Over the next three years, government’s gross debt stock is projected to increase by about R550 billion, to R2.3 trillion in 2017/18. Redemptions on debt issued over the past decade will add R190 billion to the medium term borrowing requirement. Net loan debt of the national government is expected to stabilise at less than 45 per cent of GDP in three years’ time.

South Africa’s liquid capital market and our standing in international markets enable us to meet this borrowing requirement. But we are mindful that debt sustainability requires a prudent budget framework and improvements in both saving and investment.

Our fiscal policy stance recognises that state-owned companies and municipalities will continue to face substantial investment requirements over the period ahead. Moderation in the main budget deficit creates space in the wider capital market for infrastructure financing of both the wider public sector and private businesses.

In addressing these and other fiscal challenges, government is firmly resolved to steer a responsible and sustainable course.

Medium term expenditure and the division of revenue

Honourable Speaker, our Constitution requires an equitable division of nationally collected revenue between national, provincial and local government. This is set out in the Division of Revenue Bill and its accompanying Explanatory Memorandum. The allocations are explained in the Budget Review and elaborated in the Estimates of National Expenditure.

In preparing these proposals, we have benefited from recommendations of the Financial and Fiscal Commission and Parliament’s committees. As is required by section 7 of the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act of 2009, a report is included in the Budget Review which responds to concerns raised by the finance and appropriations committees, and in portfolio committees’ budgetary review and recommendation reports. We greatly appreciate these contributions of Parliament to the rigour and integrity of our budget process.

The national share of non-interest expenditure is about 48 per cent, provinces receive 43 per cent and 9 per cent goes to municipalities.

Allocations to basic services provided by municipalities have been prioritised, despite the constraints of the budget framework. A new approach is proposed for cities, to support their growth and restructuring and strengthen infrastructure investment. A review of local government infrastructure grants is in progress, which will lead to simplification and consolidation of the financing arrangements.

Over the longer term, progress in municipalities requires local economic growth, property development and revenue capacity, alongside national support. These are key elements in the “back to basics” municipal development strategy.

Economic development

Honourable Members, our support through the budget for economic development is wide-ranging, as it must be if we are to diversify our growth and broaden participation.

Innovation and technology change are at the heart of this development strategy. Support for the oceans economy has been allocated R296 million over the next three years. This will enhance our climate change research and management of ocean resources. South African science and technology also continues to benefit from our leading role in the Square Kilometre Array astronomy partnership, which will spend approximately R2.1 billion over the next three years. Minister Pandor is guiding our science councils towards more effective partnerships with industry and academic institutions.

R2.7 billion has been allocated over the medium term under the Mineral Policy and Promotion programme to promote investment in mining and petroleum beneficiation projects.

R108 million has been allocated for research and regulatory requirements for licensing shale gas exploration and hydraulic fracturing.

Government will continue to strengthen support for agricultural development and trade, under Minister Zokwana. The projected conditional allocation to provinces over the medium term is R7 billion. Access of emerging farmers to finance will be expanded, in collaboration with the Land Bank. Since the inception of the recapitalisation and development programme in 2008, 1 459 farms have been supported, and 4.3 million hectares has been acquired for redistribution. A further 1.2 million hectares will be acquired over the next three years, and R4.7 billion is allocated for recapitalisation and development of farms.

Establishment of the Office of the Valuer-General in Minister Nkwinti’s department will assist in the orderly implementation of land acquisition and redistribution
activities.

Employment and enterprise development

Honourable Members, unemployment remains our single greatest economic and social challenge. Government continues to prioritise measures aimed at generating employment. These include tax incentives for employment and investment, support for enterprise development, skills development and employment programmes.

R10.2 billion has been allocated over the MTEF period to manufacturing development incentives and support for growing service industries, such as business process outsourcing. Under Minister Davies’ oversight, the manufacturing competitiveness enhancement programme will spend R5.4 billion and will assist 1 450 companies with financial support to upgrade facilities and skills development.

Special economic zones are allocated R3.5 billion over the medium term, mainly for infrastructure development. The work of Minister Hanekom’s department in promoting tourism continues to be supported. Over the MTEF period, Minister Zulu’s new Department will spend R3.5 billion on mentoring and training support to small businesses.

The Jobs Fund will spend R4 billion in partnership with the private sector on projects that create new employment, support work-seekers and address structural constraints to more inclusive growth. The community work programme will be extended to all municipalities. Its allocations increase by 21 per cent a year.

The Department of Environmental Affairs has an allocation of R11.8 billion to fund more than 107 000 full time equivalent jobs and 224 000 work opportunities through environmental EPWP programmes.

A total of R590 million has been allocated to the Green Fund over the medium term, for strategic environmental projects in partnership with the private sector.

Health and social protection
Honourable Speaker, expenditure on health and social protection will continue to grow steadily, contributing to better life expectancy and household income security.

Health spending will reach R178 billion in 2017/18. We have seen a marked reduction in child mortality over the past five years, supported by improved access to antenatal services.

Our antiretroviral treatment programme now reaches 3 million patients. The motherto- child transmission of HIV has decreased from 20 per cent a decade ago to 2 per cent last year, and is expected to decline further over the period ahead.

In this budget, R1.5 billion is shifted from provincial budgets to the national Department of Health to enable the National Institute of Communicable Diseases to be directly funded. This will be offset by lower tariffs for services provided by the National Health Laboratory Service. Port health services have also been shifted from provinces to the national department.

The Office of Health Standards Compliance has been listed as an independent legal entity with a budget rising to R125 million in 2017/18.

Under Minister Motsoaledi’s direction there has been progress over the past year in preparing for the transition to national health insurance. A discussion paper on financing options will be released shortly by the National Treasury, to accompany the NHI white paper.

Honourable Speaker, I have also agreed with Ministers Dlamini and Oliphant that we will jointly publish the long-outstanding discussion paper on social security reform. Both health insurance and social security are vital concerns of all South Africans, and we look forward to public debate and engagement between stakeholders.

Social grants play an important role in protecting the poorest households against poverty. Social assistance beneficiaries numbered 16.4 million in December 2014. In order to accommodate the growth in numbers, the budget proposals include an additional R7.1 billion on the Social Development vote.

I am also pleased to be able to announce adjustments to monthly social grants with effect from 1 April:
The old age, war veterans, disability and care dependency grants will increase by R60 to R1 410.
Child support grants increase to R330.
Foster care grants increase by R30 to R860.

In consultation with the Department of Social Development and taking into account consumer price inflation, we will review the possibility of further adjustments to grant values in October.

Education, sport and culture

Honourable Speaker, over R640 billion will be allocated to basic education during the next three years.

Under Minister Motshekga’s oversight, personnel planning for schools is currently under review, to ensure that learner-teacher ratios are maintained at appropriate levels.

The number of qualified teachers entering the public service is projected to increase from 8 227 in 2012/13 to 10 200 in 2017/18. To support teacher training, R3.1 billion will be awarded in funza lushaka bursaries over the next three years.

We will print and distribute 170 million workbooks at 23 562 public schools over this MTEF period. Each learner in Grades R to 9 will receive two books per subject each year in numeracy, mathematics, literacy, language and life skills.

The school infrastructure backlogs programme is allocated R7.4 billion for the replacement of over 500 unsafe or poorly constructed schools, as well as to address water, sanitation and electricity needs. The education infrastructure grant of R29.6 billion over the medium term will enable all schools to meet the minimum norms and standards for school infrastructure by 2016.

The budget also includes R4.1 billion over the MTEF period to build and support public libraries. School and community sport programmes and sports academies will receive R1.7 billion in conditional allocations to provinces.

Post-school education and training

Honourable Speaker, allocations to post-school education and training exceed R195 billion over the medium term, increasing at an annual average of 7.1 per cent.

University operating subsidies will amount to R72.4 billion. Transfers to universities for infrastructure of R10.5 billion are proposed, including R3.2 billion for the new universities of Mpumalanga and Sol Plaatje.

We are mindful of the pressures on student financing at our higher education institutions. The National Student Financial Aid Scheme is projected to spend R11.9 billion in 2017/18, up from R9.2 billion in 2014/15. This will support a further increase in university enrolments and in technical and vocational colleges.

Progress in the quality of post-school education programmes is clearly critical. Under Minister Nzimande’s direction, the 21 sector education and training authorities and the National Skills Fund will continue to provide work placements for students and graduates. Raising the number of trainees who qualify as artisans is a special priority. Options for improving the skills funding system will be reviewed in the period ahead.

Transport, energy and communications

Fellow South Africans, we have all been reminded of the importance of infrastructure investment and maintenance over the past year. It is not just an inconvenience when the lights go out, there is a cost to the economy in production and income and jobs foregone.

Many South Africans regularly experience other kinds of infrastructure failure: unreliable water supplies, roads that are impassable when it rains, trains that break down or poor telecommunication linkages.

These are large, long-term, costly challenges, and so the work of Minister Peters, Minister Joemat-Pettersson, Minister Cwele, Minister Mokonyane and Minister Patel in securing maximum value out of available funds is especially critical.

We are able to make substantial contributions through the fiscus to infrastructure services over the MTEF period:
R1.1 billion is allocated for the upgrade of the Moloto Road to improve safety and mobility on this road.
The Passenger Rail Agency’s R53 billion ten-year renewal programme is now in progress. The first 44 new train sets, or 528 coaches, will be
delivered over the next three years.
Over R80 billion is allocated to over 220 water and sanitation projects and for local roads.
R105 billion will be spent on housing and associated bulk infrastructure requirements.
Over R18 billion in electrification funding will provide for 875 000 households to be connected to the grid or to receive off-grid electricity.
R1.1 billion is allocated for broadband connectivity in government institutions and schools.

I need to emphasise, Honourable Speaker, that not all infrastructure services qualify for budget funding. Cost recovery from users is a key foundation of infrastructure sustainability, together with fiscal support for access to essential services.

I therefore wish to endorse the Deputy President’s carefully balanced approach to resolving the Gauteng Freeway financing matter. Concerns regarding the socioeconomic impact of toll tariffs have been heard, and revised monthly ceilings will shortly be proposed. We will include a national contribution to meeting the associated cost in the Adjustments Appropriation later this year. Measures will also be taken to ease compliance and improve enforcement. But cost recovery from road-users will continue to be the principal financing mechanism for this major road system.

Investing to transform our urban space
Honourable Members, national government is working closely with metropolitan municipalities to invigorate urban development. As the NDP emphasises, realising the economic dividends of urban growth requires a new approach to providing infrastructure, housing and public transport services, while overcoming the spatial divisions of apartheid.

This budget recognises the need to assist cities in mobilising the finance required for more rapid infrastructure investment and maintenance. Amendments will be proposed to the Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Act to clarify the rules surrounding bulk infrastructure charges, and ensure an equitable and transparent system of contributions by land developers.

The National Treasury has recently met the Mayors and City Managers of all eight metropolitan municipalities to discuss how to accelerate investment, improve infrastructure maintenance and strengthen financial management. Metropolitan councils will announce details of their investment programmes in their forthcoming budget statements. The Treasury, the Department of Cooperative Governance and the Development Bank of Southern Africa will host a conference on urban infrastructure investment later this year to enable private investors to obtain further details of financing opportunities that will arise from this new programme.

I have also been reminded of the role of tax measures in supporting urban development. With us in the gallery today is Mr Vuyisa Qabaka, a Cape Town entrepreneur and co-founder of an organisation called the Good Neighbourhoods Foundation. His advice is that “Government should encourage township investment. For instance, it could promote urban development and regeneration through accelerated depreciation allowances for new building constructions or refurbishment of existing buildings.”

National allocations to municipalities continue to be equitably allocated and aligned with Minister Gordhan’s “Back to Basics” strategy. The local government equitable share was protected from the baseline reductions, to ensure that service delivery to the poor is prioritised. Allocations for water, sanitation and electricity in rural municipalities have been increased substantially. R4.3 billion will be spent over the next three years to build capacity and strengthen systems for financial management and infrastructure delivery.

The collaborative review of local government infrastructure grants will give special attention to the maintenance of infrastructure, so that the gains made over the past 20 years continue to be extended and enjoyed by all over the life of these assets.

Defence, public order and safety
Honourable Members, we still confront unacceptably high levels of crime in our country. Government spending on public order and safety and on defence will therefore continue to increase, from R163 billion this year to R193 billion by 2017/18. Police services receive about 48 per cent of the total allocation.

Effective and efficient courts, under Minister Masutha’s oversight and Chief Justice Mogoeng’s leadership, are central to constitutional democracy and the functioning of the criminal justice system. Over the medium term, a total amount of R492 million has been reprioritised towards improving access to justice. This will increase capacity for court support personnel, public defenders and prosecutors.

In order to strengthen the independence of the judiciary, the Office of the Chief Justice has been established as a new department. It becomes fully operational on the 1st April 2015, with a budget over the MTEF period of R5.2 billion.

The fight against corruption remains a central priority. Additional allocations have been made to the Public Protector and the Financial Intelligence Centre for increasing their human resource capacity.

South Africa’s defence force under Minister Mapisa-Nqakula will continue to be deployed for safeguarding our borders and in peacekeeping operations in several conflict areas. Budget provision for border safeguarding and regional security amounts to R2.8 billion and R4.5 billion, respectively, over the next three years.

The budget also includes R834 million for access of military veterans to health care and housing services.

Financial management: ensuring value for money

Honourable Members, better value for money in public service delivery depends on rigorous financial management, effective systems and an unrelenting fight against corruption.

Supply chain management in the public sector is far from perfect. There are frequent allegations of corruption and inefficiency. Against this background, the National Treasury has conducted a review of public sector supply chain management, drawing on the views and experience of government, business and civil society. The review was published last month, and is a candid reflection of our current state of public sector procurement, the reforms that are needed and the opportunities that an efficient, transparent SCM system presents.

In consultation with the Minister of Basic Education, the following reforms are in progress:
All books delivered to schools from January 2016 will be managed through a centrally negotiated contract.
With effect from May this year, all school building plans will be standardised and the cost of construction will be controlled by the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer. Too often, and for too long, we have paid too much for school building projects.
Routine maintenance of school buildings and minor construction works will be decentralised. This will be accompanied by measures to combat inefficiency and corruption at district and school level.

From April 2015, a central supplier database will be introduced. Suppliers will only be required to register once when they do business with the state. This will significantly reduce the administrative burden for business, especially small and medium-sized enterprises. The database will interface with SARS, the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission and the payroll system. It will electronically verify a supplier’s tax and BEE status, and enable public sector officials doing business with the state to be identified. This intervention will also reduce the administrative burden for SCM practitioners and address many of the concerns raised by the Auditor-General every year.

In close collaboration with the State Information Technology Agency, a central etender portal will be implemented from April this year. It will be compulsory that all tenders be advertised on this portal, and all tender documents will be freely available there. Tender advertisements in newspapers and the government gazette will be phased out.

A new approach to funding health and education infrastructure in provinces was introduced in 2013. Following a two-year planning cycle, the 2015/16 allocations for the education infrastructure grant and the health facility revitalisation grant reflect this new approach. On top of their base allocations, provinces that meet the minimum planning standards have been rewarded with additional allocations. For instance, the Eastern Cape receives an additional R233 million due to the quality of its plans for health and education infrastructure investment. Provinces that failed to meet the minimum standards will be prioritised for assistance through the on-going Infrastructure Delivery Improvement Programme. This allocation methodology will be expanded over the MTEF period so that all provincial departments continuously improve their planning to be eligible to receive incentive allocations.

The non-payment of suppliers on time is a perennial problem that needs serious attention. This practice works against government’s efforts to grow the economy and develop the SMME sector. Payment of suppliers within 30 days will now be included among other SCM requirements in the performance agreements of accounting officers.

Revenue and tax measures

In turning to the revenue proposals for the year ahead, Honourable Members, let me emphasise again that we are accountable to citizens and taxpayers for ensuring value for money in our stewardship of public resources.

Our current projection is that tax revenue will amount to R979 billion in 2014/15, or about R14.7 billion less than the budget estimate a year ago. Including non-tax revenue, social security funds and other receipts, and after deducting R51.7 billion which goes to Southern African Customs Union partner countries, consolidated budget revenue will be R1 091 billion this year, or about 8.2 per cent more than in 2013/14.

In the recent past, there has been considerable variation in customs union receipts, because of fluctuations in regional trade. The period ahead will also see large shifts in customs receipts, with potentially adverse implications for our partner countries. South Africa remains keen to see a revised and improved revenue sharing arrangement that would stabilise and safeguard these resource flows.

Personal income tax remains a buoyant source of revenue, but the slowdown in business conditions is reflected in lower-than-expected company tax, value added tax and customs revenue.
Once again, the South African Revenue Service has done sterling work in difficult circumstances. In welcoming Mr Tom Moyane as the new Commissioner, I would like to convey my appreciation to all the personnel of SARS for their efforts over the past year.

Tax policy aims to raise revenue in a manner that is fair and efficient, while contributing to social solidarity and supporting long-term economic growth and job creation. Tax reforms since 1994 have considerably broadened the tax base, through inclusion of capital gains and closing of tax loopholes.

As I indicated in the Medium Term Budget Policy Statement in October, even after lowering our expenditure ceiling, and taking into account the need for sustainability in managing our debt, there is a structural gap between our revenue requirements and projected tax proceeds. To bridge this gap we require additional revenue. In considering tax policy options, we have drawn on advice of the Davis Tax Committee and through the broader annual tax consultation process. In my view, the need to maintain the overall progressivity of the tax structure is a compelling consideration.

Tax proposals

The 2015 Budget tax proposals aim to increase tax revenues as required, limit the erosion of the corporate tax base, increase incentives for small businesses and promote a greener economy.

The main tax proposals are as follows:

Personal income tax rates will be raised by one percentage point for all taxpayers earning more than R181 900 a year. This raises tax by R21 a month for a taxpayer below age 65 with an annual income of R200 000. Those earning R500 000 would pay R271 a month more, and at R1.5 million a year the tax increase is R1 105 a month. However, tax brackets, rebates and medical scheme contribution credits will be adjusted for inflation, as in previous years. The net effect is that there will be tax relief below about R450 000 a year, while those with higher incomes will pay more in tax.

Honourable Members, an increase in the general fuel levy of 30.5 cents a litre will take effect in April.

Following recommendations of the Davis Committee, a more generous tax regime is proposed for businesses with a turnover below R1 million a year. Qualifying businesses with a turnover below R335 000 a year will pay no tax, and the maximum rate is reduced from 6 per cent to 3 per cent. To complement this relief, SARS is establishing small business desks in its revenue offices to assist in complying with tax requirements.

The rates and brackets for transfer duties on the sale of property will be adjusted to provide relief to middle-income households. The new rates eliminate transfer duty on properties below R750 000, while the rate on properties above R2.25 million will increase.

Members of the House are advised that excise duties on alcoholic beverages and tobacco products will again increase:
the tax on a quart of beer goes up by 15½ cents,
a bottle of wine will cost 15 cents more,
a bottle of sparkling wine goes up by 48 cents,
a bottle of whisky will be R3.77 more;
a pack of 20 cigarettes goes up by 82 cents.

Amendments are proposed to the diesel refund system which applies in the agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining sectors. Some of these changes will take effect this year and some in 2016.
The net effect of these proposals on 2015/16 tax revenue is an increase of R8.3 billion, which will bring tax revenue for the year to R1 081 billion, or about 10.4 per cent more than 2014/15 tax revenue.

Further tax proposals

I am also proposing a number of tax measures to promote energy efficiency, which will be discussed further with industry, the electricity regulator, Eskom and other interested parties.

The first proposal is a temporary increase in the electricity levy, from 3.5c/kWh to 5.5c/kWh, to assist in demand management. This additional 2c/kWh will be withdrawn when the electricity shortage is over. Secondly, an increase is proposed in the energy-efficiency savings incentive from 45 c/kWh to 95 c/kWh, together with its extension to cogeneration projects. Other measures under consideration include enhancing the accelerated depreciation for solar photovoltaic renewable energy.

In the absence of a carbon tax, the electricity levy serves both to promote energy efficiency and encourage lower greenhouse gas emissions. The introduction of a carbon tax in 2016 will provide an additional tool to deal more sustainably with the current electricity shortage, while lowering the electricity levy. A draft carbon tax bill will be introduced later this year for a further round of public consultation.

To ensure that the burden is fairly distributed, steps will be taken to ensure that the electricity levy applies to all users, especially energy-intensive users, while ensuring that there are no double-payments.

Honourable Members, we are also taking further steps to combat financial leakages which deprive our economy of billions of rand through erosion of the tax base, profit shifting and illicit money flows.

This is the advice I received from Durban businessman, Mr Wolfe Braude, who is with us today: “Action has to be taken to close tax evasion loopholes such as transfer pricing, and profit shifting strategies by SA corporates. I ask that South Africa continue its support for the recent G20 decisions in this regard and the implementation of actions in support of transparency and sharing of information. South Africa must similarly stand firm in the SADC against tax havens.”

The South African Reserve Bank and the Revenue Service work closely together to monitor capital flows. This assists in identifying movements of funds for tax reasons. Internationally, there is increasing collaboration between bank regulators and tax authorities, and so progress is being made to reduce both capital leakage and tax evasion. Drawing on advice of the Davis Committee, amendments will be proposed to improve transfer-pricing documentation and revise the rules for controlled foreign companies and the digital economy.

There are two further revenue proposals that I need to explain. They both arise from challenges in respect of earmarked taxes.

The first is a 50 cents a litre increase in the Road Accident Fund levy.

This is a substantial increase from the present levy of R1.04. It is required in order to finance the progress made by the RAF administration in clearing the claims backlog. But it also reflects the unsustainability of the current compensation system, which has accumulated a R98 billion unfunded liability. Legislation to establish the new Road Accident Benefit Scheme will be tabled this year, to provide for affordable and equitable support for those injured in road accidents. Once the legislation has been passed, the levy will be assigned to the new scheme.

The second special revenue proposal is a one-year relief measure in respect of Unemployment Insurance Fund contributions. Unlike the Road Accident Fund, the UIF has an accumulated surplus of over R90 billion. Improved benefits are now being introduced, but it is nonetheless possible to provide temporary relief to both employers and employees. The proposal is that the contribution threshold should be reduced to R1000 a month for the 2015/16 year. This means that employers and employees will each pay R10 a month during the year ahead, putting R15 billion back into the pockets of workers and businesses.

Financial position of public sector institutions
State-owned companies

Honourable Speaker, state-owned companies play a key role in promoting economic growth and social development. Transnet’s freight modernisation programme, for example, has raised the number of trains that run between Johannesburg and Durban to sixty a day, from fewer than 20 a decade ago.

State-owned companies will invest about R360 billion over the next three years, accounting for about 20 per cent of South Africa’s gross capital formation.

However, the financial position of some state enterprises is unsatisfactory, undermining their ability to contribute toward development.
Recommendations to make our public entities more relevant to South Africa’s developmental needs have been made by the Presidential Review Committee chaired by Ms Ria Phiyega. Reforms are required to ensure that state companies contribute to building a competitive economy and are not an unnecessary drain on the fiscus, and that developmental mandates are appropriately financed and serve the national interest.

Private investment and partnerships with state-owned companies are elements of our strategy for strengthening infrastructure investment and improving service
delivery.
As indicated in last year’s Medium Term Budget Policy Statement, fiscal support to state-owned companies over the period ahead will be financed through offsetting asset sales so that there is no net impact on the budget deficit. The required turnaround in performance and delivery on government priorities will be closely monitored, under the Deputy President’s oversight.

To stabilise Eskom’s financial position, it will apply to the regulator this year for adjustments towards cost-reflective tariffs. In October 2014 we announced a broad package for Eskom, including a capital injection of R23 billion, overnance improvements, operational cost containment and additional borrowing and support for required tariff increases. The fiscal allocation of R23 billion will be paid in three instalments, with the first transfer to be made by June 2015. A special appropriation bill will be tabled, once the finance has been raised. If further support is deemed necessary, consideration will be given to an equity conversion of government’s subordinated loan to Eskom.

Government has also stepped in to address the financial position of South African Airways. SAA reported a net loss of R2.6 billion in 2013/14, as a result of high operating costs, losses on several international routes and valuation adjustments. We have made guarantees of R14.4 billion available to SAA, of which the airline has drawn R8.3 billion. Measures to achieve operational efficiencies and restore profitability are now in progress.

Guarantees have also been provided to the South African Post Office, subject to implementation of its turnaround strategy. This involves revised universal service obligations and delivery targets, taking into account the decline in the mail and courier business and the shift to digital communication. Minister Cwele has appointed an administrator to lead SAPO’s turnaround.

Development finance institutions

Honourable Speaker, one of the strengths on which implementation of our National Development Plan rests is the financial health and capacity of our development finance institutions.

At the end of 2013/14, their combined assets amounted to R250 billion, against liabilities of R107 billion. The Development Bank of Southern Africa, the Industrial Development Corporation, the Land Bank and other national DFIs will expand their loan portfolios by about 33 per cent over the next two years, including substantial investments in renewable energy, agriculture, industrial infrastructure and beneficiation projects.

Several initiatives are in progress to strengthen the role of DFIs:
A review of provincial entities has been initiated, aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and sustainability.
An organisational review of the Land Bank will be conducted under the leadership of the newly appointed Board and CEO, to enhance its support for emerging farmers and commercial agriculture.
The DBSA will take the lead in developing South Africa’s municipal debt market in order to accelerate both public and private sector investment in urban renewal.
The IDC aims to mobilise R100 billion over the next five years to promote faster industrial development, mineral beneficiation and agro-processing.

Of special importance is the Land Bank’s collaboration with the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform to bring rural land restitution and redistribution projects to full production. This initiative will build on the Bank’s success in supporting black farmers through its Retail Emerging Markets division, which has financed over 400 projects and created 7 000 employment opportunities to date, without any defaults.

The DBSA will continue to manage the Infrastructure and Investment Programme for South Africa, which is a partnership with the European Commission to strengthen project preparation and co-funding arrangements. It also provides support to the Independent Power Producer Programme, which will be extended to include new generation capacity from hydro, coal and gas sources to complement Eskom’s baseload energy capacity. Co-generation and demand management initiatives are also being supported.

Honourable Speaker, South Africa signed a treaty last year to give birth to a new multilateral development bank to be based in Shanghai, China. We are excited to be part of this new venture, especially given the leverage South Africa will have on resources that will augment our infrastructure investment programme and those of Sub-Saharan Africa countries. The first regional office of the Bank will be located in South Africa.

Public service pensions

Honourable Members, I am pleased to be able to report that under the capable management of the Public Investment Corporation, the retirement funding assets of public service members and pensioners have grown strongly over the past year. The Government Employees Pension Fund remains well-funded and soundly managed.

Pensioners of the GEPF, the Associated Institutions Pension Fund and the Temporary Employees Pension Fund, as well as recipients of special and military pensions, will receive a 5.8 per cent pension increase with effect from April 2015.

We have noted that some civil servants are resigning from GEPF, driven by high levels of indebtedness or incorrect information on the retirement reform process. I want to assure civil servants that the pension reforms currently under consideration will not adversely affect benefits to members of the GEPF.

Financial sector reforms

Honourable Members, I am pleased to confirm that with effect from 1 March 2015, the new tax free-savings accounts will be available.

Significant progress has been achieved in relation to retirement reforms, and consultations with NEDLAC will continue. The first draft of default regulations will be issued shortly for public comment. These reforms have one central objective: to maximise the long-term benefits to retirement fund members, so that they can retire comfortably.

Our financial services sector is one of South Africa’s strengths, but as noted in our recent market conduct policy framework document, it needs to do more to treat customers fairly.

The bill establishing two new regulatory authorities, the so-called “twin peaks” reform, will be tabled this year. We have strengthened regulations for banks, and will be doing so this year for insurers, derivatives and hedge funds. We will be taking steps to strengthen the supervision of large financial groups and collective investment schemes, particularly money market funds.

Under its curatorship, African Bank is now generating positive cash flows. We announced a R7 billion backstop last year, but our expectation is that the bank will be stabilised without recourse to taxpayer funds. In December, the International Monetary Fund released its assessment of the South African financial system. It concluded that our financial system is stable and our regulatory system sound. The report indicates need to strengthen supervision of large financial groups and collective investment schemes, in view of the concentration and interconnectedness of our financial sector.

The problem of excessive household indebtedness remains a serious challenge. Approximately 45 per cent of credit-active consumers have impaired credit records. This results in part from poor market conduct by lenders and financial advisors.

We are engaging with the major banks on further steps to be taken to assist overindebted consumers. Government also welcomes initiatives of employers in the private sector who have audited garnishee orders applied to their employees, and have taken steps to identify illegally-issued orders.

Conclusion

Honourable Speaker, this has been a challenging budget to prepare, under difficult economic circumstances. The resources at our disposal are limited. Our economic growth initiatives have to be intensified.

Preparing a budget under difficult circumstances is a reminder that our public services are many and varied, and that we rely on the efforts and good judgement of many thousands of public servants, teachers, health practitioners and law enforcement officers, every day. And our economy comprises a great diversity of enterprises, factories, mines, service centres and shop-floors, welfare organisations, trade unions and industry associations. Our collective future depends on the energy and enterprise of all of us.

The 2015 Budget takes forward our National Development Plan and medium term strategic framework, recognising that the gains of our democracy have to be shared more equally and our economy has to be given greater impetus.
Allow me to thank you, Mister President, Mister Deputy President and all of my Cabinet colleagues, for your guidance and understanding of the challenges before us and the choices for which we have shared responsibility.

Honourable Speaker, and Members of the House – these are our budget proposals, and I look forward to further engagement through our committees and the Parliamentary budget process. I am especially grateful to the chairs of the finance and appropriation committees, who have responsibility for steering consideration of the Division of Revenue Bill and the Appropriation Bill, and the revenue bills which will be tabled later in the year.

Preparation of the budget is the outcome of inputs and efforts of countless people, in Treasury, in government departments, in provinces and municipalities and in our public entities. I thank you all.

Implementation of the budget, Honourable Speaker, is the collective outcome of the activities of all South Africans: workers and businesses who contribute to economic activity, investors who make growth possible, savers and taxpayers, officials and service providers, protectors, advisors, those who work on our farms, those who care for the young and elderly.

It is my privilege to table these proposals for the consideration of all South Africans, and to reaffirm our commitment to work together with all South Africans in pursuing a better future.

Source: Daily Maverick

In the Shoes of a Tax-compliant Expatriate

VISITORS to the Philippines come for the beautiful islands, tropical weather, and exotic cuisine. It therefore comes as no surprise to find foreigners all over the Philippines. But they’re not all lounging by hotel pools — many of them are prowling the central business districts wearing suits, supervising projects in the red-hot business process outsourcing sector, among other industries currently attracting investment. Only a few startling statistics are necessary to demonstrate that quite a number of them are here for business. One is the fact that the tiny British Virgin Islands — a favored address for registering investment vehicles — topped all sources of foreign investment in the 2013-2014 fiscal year. Another is that only 528, or 20%, of all companies registered with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) are wholly Filipino-owned, indicating that the remainder have at least some foreign ownership.

Foreign investors seeking direct participation in the management of their projects in the Philippines usually send a representative or live here themselves. For such investors, here is a useful checklist of responsibilities of expatriates working in the Philippines:

PRE-WORKING REQUIREMENTS
To be legally employed in the Philippines, expatriates are required to obtain a work visa. An employment contract and benefits package are some of the key requirements before a visa is approved. The latter should be structured efficiently for tax purposes before it is submitted to the Philippines’ immigration department.

TAX FILING OBLIGATION
Aliens residing in the Philippines or deriving income in the Philippines are generally required to file an income tax return in the Philippines except expatriates covered by substituted filing.

Under substituted filing, a resident expatriate earning purely compensation income from a single employer on which withholding tax on compensation had been properly withheld shall no longer be required to file an income tax return. The Certificate of Withholding Taxes on Compensation (BIR Form 2316), issued by the local employer would suffice for the purpose. If expatriates plan to claim tax credits in their home country, they may use the BIR Form 2316 or alternatively, they may file income tax returns at their option or as required by their home country.

Applying the above, resident expatriates and non-resident expatriates engaged in trade or business in the Philippines are required to file an income tax return.

CHARGE TO TAX
In general, aliens are taxable in the Philippines only on Philippine-sourced income. The income from employment, such as salaries, allowances, benefits and other forms of compensation for labor or personal services performed in the Philippines are treated as Philippine-sourced income, regardless of where the payment is made. The salaries and benefits must be subjected to withholding tax by the employer.

In certain cases, however, an expatriate receives compensation from a foreign affiliate of the local employer, in addition to the salaries received from the local employer. This set-up, where two companies are paying the expatriate, is referred to as a split-pay arrangement. If the foreign-paid salary is given in account for the assignment or work in the Philippines, such income paid by the foreign company is also taxable in the Philippines.

In most cases, the foreign-paid salary above is not subject to withholding tax since the salaries are not shouldered by the local employer and not paid through them. This is because the salaries are directly deposited to the account of the expatriate without the details being known to the local employer. If this is not subject to withholding tax, the expatriate employee loses his qualification for substituted filing.

In addition to salaries, these are some of the benefits and allowances granted by employers and some income earned by the employee from other sources:

• Fringe benefits

The employer may grant or pay the employee housing, car, or personal household expenses. The expatriate need not worry since these benefits are subject to fringe benefit tax which is borne by the employer.

• De minimis benefits

These are small benefits, such as laundry allowance and clothing allowance. Although these are non-taxable, they must be reported as part of the non-taxable amount in the income tax return.

• Passive income

This includes income exempt from tax and income subject to final tax, such as interest, royalties, dividends, and winnings, sale or exchange of stock, etc. For 2014, unless it is further deferred in the succeeding year, these must be disclosed in the individual income tax return. It is therefore imperative that the expatriate all his income earned in the Philippines that is subject to final tax or exempted from income tax.

Speaking of stocks, it is very common for multinational companies to grant stock options to its employees for services rendered in the Philippines. Under Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 79-2014 issued by the Bureau of Internal Revenue, it seems the stock option is taxed upon grant and exercise. Expatriates are advised to seek special advice on the taxation of stock options.

Other taxes that expatriates are responsible to pay include: (1) annual community tax, (2) real property tax if owning a condominium, and (3) social security. Social security is compulsory for all individuals working in the Philippines. However, for citizens of countries with which the Philippines has existing social security agreements — such as Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Korea, Netherlands, Quebec, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom — a request for exemption may be filed with the Philippine social security authorities.

POSSIBLE TAX SAVINGS
Lastly, expatriates may be entitled to income tax relief in accordance with the international tax treaties entered into by the Philippine government. Under most tax treaties, an expatriate who is a resident of a treaty country shall not be liable to pay income tax on employment exercised in the Philippines if the employee is present in the Philippines for an aggregate period of less than 180 or 90 days for the taxable year, depending on the alien’s country of origin. However, to avail of the exemption under the tax treaties, a tax treaty relief application must be filed with the tax bureau before the first taxable transaction/payment is made.

An expatriate earning income in the Philippines should know his tax responsibilities. Whether the income is exempt or not from tax, there is always the responsibility of filing a return or securing an exemption.

Marie Fe L. Fawagan is a manager with the Tax Advisory and Compliance division of Punongbayan & Araullo.

Source: http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Economy&title=in-the-shoes-of-a-tax-compliant-expatriate&id=101570

Who Gets a Raise?

Is it time to ask for a raise? Neil Irwin at The Upshot writes that this could (finally) be a good year for wages, with small businesses, and a big health insurer, planning to increase pay. And The Billfold titled a recent post “The Year America Gets a Raise” (though its author, Mike Dang, also cautioned that “we can only watch and wait” to see if wages really rise).

But even a large-scale increase in wages might not benefit everyone equally — asking for a raise, some say, works better for some employees than for others.

At The Atlantic, Bourree Lam reports on a study by the salary information firm Payscale, which found that of those who asked for raises, 44 percent actually got the amount they were looking for. Twenty-five percent got no raise at all. And at least among workers with M.B.A.s, women had worse luck than men: Their requests for raises were turned down 21 percent of the time, while men’s were denied just ten percent of the time.

In the wake of Linda Babcock’s popular 2003 book “Women Don’t Ask,” said Joan C. Williams, a law professor and co-author of the book “What Works for Women at Work,” many blamed wage inequality on women’s failure to speak up and request raises. But, Dr. Williams argued, research has found “that women who do ask for raises tend to be disliked, and often end up making lower starting salaries.”

“Stereotypes are that women are supposed to be modest and self-effacing,” she said — and asking for a raise flies in the face of those. And, she added, “when men ask for raises they’re also often seen as negotiating for their families” — women aren’t seen as family breadwinners, even when they are. “So it may seem selfless for a man to negotiate for a raise because after all he has to support his family, whereas a woman, she’s just a prima donna on an ego trip.”

Those asking for raises may face discrimination on the basis of race as well as gender, she notes. “To the extent that white men kind of get a pass on swagger,” she said, “that’s denied to other people.”

For black women, says Robert Livingston, a professor of organizational behavior who studies race and gender in the workplace, bias can work in multiple ways. “The stereotypes are quite different for African-American women compared to white women,” he said, “and it’s not perceived as being as much of a violation of stereotype expectations for African-American women to be a bit more direct.” However, black women are “held to a different level or expectation of performance” than white women. “If a white woman and a black woman both make a mistake on the job,” he said, “then the black woman is the first to go, before white women or black men, because they’re two degrees removed from the prototypical stereotype of a leader, which is a white male.”

When Dr. Williams, Katherine W. Phillips, and Erika V. Hall surveyed sixty female scientists of color, they also found that black women were “allowed more leeway than other groups of women to behave in dominant ways” — but that they also reported having to “provide more evidence of competence than others to prove themselves to colleagues.” Asian-American women, they found, faced greater censure for behaving assertively than women of other races, and Latina women reported that they were sometimes called angry or “too emotional” if they asserted themselves.

As for black men, Dr. Livingston said, “I think they would definitely face backlash when asking for raises or asking for promotion.” Some of his research shows that “black males benefit from having features that make them look more childlike,” he said — “and conversely, things that make black males look more cocky or arrogant or hyper-masculine or threatening really hurt black men.”

The opposite is true for white men — some research has even shown “that white men are punished for being too modest,” Dr. Livingston said. “If you’re a white male the world is pretty much your oyster. You can ask for what you want.” But for women of any race and for black men, “that doesn’t seem to be the case.”

Kym Harris, the president and C.E.O. of a coaching company that works with female and minority professionals, said she’s never worked with a woman who got pushback for asking for a raise. However, she said, some companies don’t give women of color what they need to succeed: “We’re not getting feedback in organizations,” she explained, often because “people are afraid of how we’re going to respond to the feedback, and so rather than giving us feedback that will allow us to improve our performance, we don’t get anything until we begin to derail or it’s just too late.”

One reason for this fear, she said: the “stereotype of the angry black woman.” For some women of color, she said, “there’s an intensity that we bring sometimes that people misinterpret. And if you combine that intensity with the stereotypes and biases that some people hold there is an apprehension to give feedback, particularly constructive feedback.”

To combat this problem, she said, companies can “give consistent feedback,” not only “at performance appraisal time, but maybe quarterly, or every other month.”

And those in leadership roles can “be more open to mentoring and initiating relationships.” “When they see someone in the organization who happens to be a woman of color doing well, who has the potential to advance in the organization,” she advised, “reach out and invite that person to lunch, have coffee with that person, get to know that person more, open the door.”

“When you have authentic relationships,” she said, “you have trust. When you have trust, there’s feedback. When there’s feedback, you have confidence about where you stand as it relates to your performance and how you’re viewed in the organization.”

And, said Dr. Livingston, companies need to recognize that “there are different propensities for certain groups to put forth requests for raises or for promotions, and that there’s also different consequences when the groups do” — and that this contributes to pay inequality. Companies also need to be “taking proactive steps to change the organizational structure and the procedure” around raises and promotions — he mentioned the idea of “standardizing the promotion process” so that people don’t always have to ask.

If two people are doing equally well at their jobs, “but one person asks and the other person doesn’t for social reasons, then that’s unfair,” he said. “One is reaping the reward for something that he or she hasn’t really earned.”

Source: http://op-talk.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/01/26/who-gets-a-raise/?_r=0

Foreign Withholding Taxes

South African and multinational businesses operating in the larger African continent were elated by the introduction in 2011 of the section 6quin relief for withholding taxes suffered despite the treaty provisions preventing same.

The elation, however, may be short lived! After offering much welcomed relief and promoting the gateway to Africa initiative for a mere 4 odd years, it is currently proposed that the relief be withdrawn.

While several commentators have pleaded with Treasury not to withdraw the relief, we are yet to see whether or not parliament will allow the relief or some remnants of it to stay.

In the absence of the section 6quin relief, taxpayers who have relied thereon to date will have no choice but to rely, in the alternative, on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (“MAP”) in double tax treaties to get their own back or alternatively, to take erroneous withholding taxes up with foreign revenue authorities directly.

Our team includes highly experienced and well qualified tax professionals, lawyers and charted accountants who have deep expertise on MAP’s and have assisted several taxpayers in claiming back incorrectly withheld taxes.

In Which Countries Do People Pay The Most Tax?

Income tax is a constant source of controversy and debate, no matter what country you live in. “Should 5% appear too small, be thankful I don’t take it all … You’re working for no one but me,” sang the Beatles in their 1966 hit Taxman, in an attack on the then Labour government’s high tax rates.

The amount of income tax you pay varies wildly between countries, from almost 60% for high earners in certain countries to 0% in some offshore havens and oil-rich nations.

So, which countries take the biggest slice of their workers’ earnings? The table below shows the top 15 countries for marginal personal income tax rates in 2014, as well as selected Nordic and G7 nations.

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 9.21.01 PM

Sweden tops the list with a whopping tax rate of 56.86%, followed closely by Nordic neighbour Denmark (56.22%), France (54.01%) and Spain (52%).

For an in-depth look at how business tax rates (rather than personal income tax) vary around the world and what this means for a country’s level of competitiveness, take a look at our Global Competitiveness Report 2015-16.

Author: Ross Chainey, Digital Media Specialist, World Economic Forum

Image: Workers walk across a footbridge towards the Canary Wharf business district in London February 26, 2014. REUTERS/Eddie Keogh

Source: https://agenda.weforum.org/2015/10/in-which-countries-do-people-pay-the-most-tax/?utm_content=buffer4be23&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Where Is The Best Country To Be An Expat?

People take photos with the skyline of the central business district shrouded by haze in Singapore September 10, 2015. The 3-hour PSI reading in Singapore was 174 at 1900 SGT (1100 GMT) on Thursday. REUTERS/Edgar Su – RTSHBZ

A new survey of 21,950 expatriates from around the world has crowned Singapore as the best place to be an expat. The Expat Explorer country league table, commissioned by HSBC and now in its eighth year, uses a variety of criteria including economics, experience and family life. Singapore received a 67% approval from expats living there, who reported being encouraged by the nation’s strong economy and the opportunities available to them for career progression.

In the individual pillars, Switzerland ranked first for best economy, New Zealand for experience (overall quality of life) while Sweden was ranked highest for family life.

Living abroad has benefits beyond career advancement. Over half of expat spouses said that they felt the experience had brought them closer together. Confusion and difficulty over managing finances in a foreign country was cited as the most challenging aspect of living abroad.

The report notes that while the allure of finding better jobs and experiences in other countries is a key factor in moving abroad, even in the top 10 nations, everyone’s experience is different. Potential emigrants should be sure they know that “the grass isn’t greener, just a different colour of green”.

HSBC_Expat_Explorer_2015_report.pdf_-_2015-09-30_11.30.32

Source: HSBC

How to Hire a Financial Advisor Who Won’t Rip You Off

How to Hire a Financial Advisor Who Won’t Rip You Off

Let’s face it: as a general populace, we aren’t great at managing money. But it’s no wonder why: From taxes to investing to debt-busting, there’s a lot that goes into financial planning. And while we’re all for learning to do it yourself, there are a number of reasons you’d enlist the help of an advisor. Here’s when you might need one, where to find one, and how to make sure you pick one that meets your needs.

When Is It Time to Hire a Financial Advisor?

The basics of personal finance aren’t terribly difficult, and with a little research, you can master financial milestones like getting out of debt or even investing. But there are some specific instances in your life in which it might make sense to hire an advisor. Forbes outlines a few:

  • You’re recently married: You’ll probably have a lot of questions about merging accounts, responsibilities for the other person’s finances, communicating about money, filing taxes and so on. A financial advisor can lay down the basics and help you manage your finances as a married couple.
  • You’re starting a new business: Or freelancing. When I decided to leave a full-time job and work as a freelancer, talking to an advisor would’ve been smart. Rather than navigate the confusing maze of how taxes work on my own, a financial advisor could have talked me through it and saved me a lot of time and headache. When you decide on self-employment, whether it’s freelancing or launching a business, talking to a financial advisor is a good idea.
    Along those same lines, Forbes says it might make sense to talk to an advisor when you switch careers in general. They can help you prepare for the switch and stay afloat during the transition.
  • Your family has grown: If you become a parent, there are a lot of financial considerations to make. How will your taxes change? How do you start saving for college? Do you need an estate plan? A financial advisor can help you answer those questions and more.
  • You’re planning a big purchase: A house is probably the most common example. It’s a daunting process with a lot of little details to consider. An advisor can give you insight on the best place to park your savings or how to prepare for the mortgage process.
  • You’ve come into a big windfall: Maybe you’ve won or inherited a huge amount of money—more than you’ve ever had—and you have no idea how to start managing it.

These are some common milestones that prompt people to hire an advisor, but you may have your own reasons, unrelated to any major life event. Personal finance blog Money Under 30 explains:

In my opinion, there are three reasons to hire a financial advisor:

1. You feel “lost” in planning for your financial future; you need a roadmap.

2. You just don’t want to deal. When it comes to money, you’re not the DIY type, and you just want a professional to take care of it.

3. You like managing your money, but realize that your financial plan would benefit from an impartial and unemotional third-party opinion.

Again, it’s great to research and come up with your own financial plan, but an advisor can save you a lot of time and energy. Whether you feel lost, or the DIY approach is stressing you out, or you’re just really busy, there are plenty of valid reasons for finding help.

The Difference Between an Advisor, a Planner, and All Those Other Financial Pros

You’ve probably heard the term financial advisor and financial planner used in the same context, so what’s the difference between the two?

Simply put, a financial advisor is a general term used to describe any professional who gives you financial advice. And this can be used to describe a number of different financial professions, as the Motley Fool explains:

So these people can be called financial advisors, wealth managers, investment managers, financial planners, financial life coaches, all these types of things. And just about anyone can say that they are such a thing. There’s no common terminology for a lot of these things. There are no laws around it. Just because someone says they provide financial advice — it may not be that they actually provide financial advice. They might just be selling you something. They might be what’s traditionally considered a broker or an agent.

On the other hand, a Certified Financial Planner® is a little more specific: it’s a professional who’s certified by the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc, so not just anyone can call themselves a CFP. And you probably want a qualified CFP dealing with your finances, because they have a fiduciary duty, meaning they’re legally required to act in your best interest. That’s huge. A stock broker, wealth manager, or any other non-certified advisor or planner isn’t required to meet this standard. That doesn’t necessarily mean all of those professionals aren’t worth their salt, but CFPs are usually very particular about their titles, and understandably so: their certification shows they’re reliable. If they mess up, they lose that certification.

To make things even more confusing, there are also CPAs—Certified Public Accountants. Most people know that CPAs help prepare taxes, but they can do more than that, and some of them may offer advising services. Generally speaking, though, CPAs are mostly hired for tax-related financial tasks, while a CFP can handle more of your financial planning.

How Much an Advisor Costs

The cost of an advisor varies depending on what kind of advisor you have. Again, financial advisor is a pretty general term, so the cost is going to vary from free to upwards of $150 to $200 an hour.

Some brokerage firms like Fidelity or Vanguard offer free or discounted financial advisory services. Of course, you get what you pay for, and they’ll primarily suggest you buy their own funds. That’s not always a bad thing, but take their service for what it’s worth, which is really just a reminder to invest with them. Plus, because they’re mostly interested in investments, they’re probably not going to help with basic budgeting or savings.

Commission and Fee-Based Advisors

Other advisors, and even CFPs, work on commissions, and they’re essentially salespeople who get paid for recommending specific investment or insurance products, like annuities. For that reason, they’re not usually recommended.

Fee-based advisors can get commissions, too, and they also get paid according to a percentage of your investment accounts they manage. This is also known as “assets under management” or AUM commissions. It’s usually 1-2% of whatever amount is in your AUM.

It’s hugely important to ask your advisor how they’re paid. Ideally, you want a fee-only advisor.

Fee-Only Advisors

Lastly, there are fee-only advisors, who simply charge a flat fee or an hourly fee for the time spent managing your finances. Because most CFPs are required to follow that fiduciary standard, they’re also fee-only and highlight the fact that they don’t accept commissions. While there are some reliable commission and fee-based firms out there, you probably want to find a fee-only CFP.

Okay, so let’s say an advisor charges an hourly, fee-only rate. That alone doesn’t tell you much. How long will it take them to complete the work? Obviously, advisors vary, but you can probably expect to spend upwards of $1,500 total. Here’s a real world example from a certified, fee-only advisor:

$1,800 to $2,400

Since I charge $150 an hour (you can request my Form ADV if you’d like and check my numbers), that means the financial planning engagement is going to take between 12 and 16 hours to complete. This includes our initial discussion, gathering up all of the applicable information from you, doing an interim report, getting your buy-in for where I’m going, and presenting you with a final report. It also includes any models I’m going to build to support my recommendations to you.

Again, this is just one example, but it gives you a ballpark idea of what you can expect to spend.

What to Expect When You Visit a Financial Advisor

Once you hire a financial advisor, their first order of business is to get a clear idea of your financial health. You’ll get a questionnaire asking about the following:

  • Assets and accounts: How much money you have, what kind of debt you have
  • Income: What your salary looks like, whether you have any additional sources of income or gifts
  • Tax situation: Withholdings, deductions, and all other tax details
  • Estate planning: Your will, beneficiary information, etc.
  • Investing: Your investments, risk tolerance, retirement goals.

Once your advisor has a thorough idea of what your financial situation looks like, that’s when the advising comes in. They’ll recommend a course of action, and after talking to you about different areas of your finances, they’ll draft a plan. According to Investopedia, this should include a summary of the most important findings from your questionnaire. The plan will wrap up your current situation, including your net worth, assets, liabilities, and so on. It will also include the goals that you discussed with the planner, whether those goals are investing goals or simply saving up an emergency fund.

If it applies, the summary should also include a thorough analysis of your investment risk tolerance, estate planning details, and other info related to your financial plans. You can also expect to see a potential best and worst case scenario for your retirement savings, along with detail on how you’ll withdraw the money at retirement.

Once your advisor comes up with a plan, they’ll work with you on implementing it and then they’ll periodically monitor your financial health and send you a periodic report.

If your financial planner handles investing, they might help you open and fund an investment account, too. They’ll come up with an ideal, customized portfolio that includes specifics on what kind of assets you should have (stocks, bonds, alternatives, real estate funds, etc.). Every firm has a different investment policy, so the approach may vary. Some firms only work with one fund company and limit your investments to that company.

It pays to do a little research on your own, because some firms may charge fees for your investment return. At the very least, learn the basics of investing on your own. You want to make sure to vet your advisor carefully, and part of that is finding out how they invest your money and how they’re paid.

Where to Start Your Search

A good recommendation from a trusted friend or family member can go a long way, but if you want to vet the reliability of your advisor (and you do), you should start with the NAPFA, the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors. Other sites, like NerdWallet, GOBankingRates, or FutureAdvisor will help you find planners and accredited advisors, too. However, NAPFA is probably the most straightforward site, because all advisors listed their database are certified, fee-only, and each year they sign and renew a Fiduciary Oath.

Once you start your search, you want to pick a few potential candidates, then do a little research. Check their company web site and bio. NAPFA recommends specifically reviewing their Form ADV (registration with the SEC). You can do this at the SEC website, but many CFPs will offer the form on their site. Once you narrow down your list to a few advisors, you’ll want to call and schedule quick phone interviews.

How to Interview Your Potential Advisor

When you talk to a potential advisor, there are a handful of important topics you’ll want to cover. Again, you should have them clarify how they’re paid. Specifically, ask about their fee structure. Even if you’re sure they’re fee-only, get them to confirm it. Obviously, you want to look at their accreditation, too. Beyond making sure you’re working with a true CFP, if the advisor sells an investment product, you also want to make sure they’re registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). If they’re managing more than $100,000 in assets, make sure they’re registered with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC).

NAPFA suggests some additional, specific questions, too. Highlights include:

  • Do you provide comprehensive financial planning or just investment management?
  • How will you help me reach my financial goals?
  • What happens to my relationship with the firm if something happens to you?
  • Are you held to a fiduciary standard at all times?

In general, talk about your specific financial needs and make sure they’re able to help you with them. However, you also want to weed out a good financial advisor from a bad one. In doing this, discuss these topics during the interview:

  • Their length of service: Do they have a proven track record?
  • Their typical client: You want to make sure they’re used to working with clients with needs similar to your own.
  • Their investing philosophy: This is why it helps to learn the basics of investing. We recommend a long-term buy and hold portfolio, and so do most personal finance experts. You want to make sure your advisor’s investment philosophy matches your own.

Forbes points out that a good advisor won’t talk 90% of the time during the interview. They’ll listen, ask questions, and offer insight. In addition, there are a few other red flags to look out for, and CFP Robert Brokamp goes over several of them in his podcast. A few of the most common ones:

  • They promise to destroy the market: If your advisor guarantees a high investment return, it’s probably time to move on. The stock market averages about 6-7%, and even that’s not guaranteed.
  • They give you advice without knowing your full financial picture: This goes hand in hand with the 90% of the talking thing. They should have a thorough idea of your financial health so they can offer a customized plan of action.
  • You feel rushed or pressured. If the planner is urging you to get back to them by a specific deadline, or they urge you to act on a limited time opportunity, they’re probably trying to sell you something beyond a solid financial future.

You should always look out for red flags like this, but vetting a fee-only CFP will help make sure you don’t have much to worry about.

It can be intimidating disclosing and handing over your finances to someone else. But sometimes, it makes sense, and there are plenty of experienced and skilled advisors out there who can help manage your money. Take your time with the process, do your research, and it shouldn’t be too hard to find one that’s reliable.

[button url=”mailto:contact@africorpsolutions.co.za” target=”” size=”small” style=”orange” icon=”” popup=”” title=””]Contact a Certified Financial Planner[/button]

[button url=”http://africorpsolutions.co.za/our-philosophy/” target=”” size=”small” style=”orange” icon=”” popup=”” title=””]Our Philosophy[/button]

 

Bitnami